| StoreTags: CPU's, Handtop, UMPC
Viewed 6555 times. 6 people liked this blog. You can rate it below if you haven't already.
The dust is settling, and the horizon is again in view, but the short term outlook is not as pretty as might have been expected some six months ago. In the short term at least, until Intel releases Menlow with the Silverthorne CPU, we can expect the majority of Handtop and UMPC devices to be constrained to an extent with low performance CPU's.
While there are some notable exceptions to the low powered CPU rule, the Sony UX at present being the most outstanding of these, the writing was on the wall regarding this trend when Samsung announced the SPH P-9000 Handtop. At the time, a lot of people questioned the Transmeta Crusoe 1 GHz CPU to be used in the Samsung, the same CPU that resulted in the OQO Model 01/01+ being called slow. Surly Samsung was not going to cripple its brand new “convergence device” Handtop with such an under powered CPU? It was never going to sell, with the competition using much faster VIA and Intel units.
Then came the OQO Model 02, resplendent with its VIA C7M 1.5 GHz CPU, that tested little better than the Transmeta Crusoe, at least on the standard benchmarks. The shouting and scuffling and general carry on that this produced was something to behold, although as usual, benchmarks do not provide the whole story, and the OQO Model 02 seems to be a reasonable performer, CPU not withstanding.
To cross the t's and dot the i's on our wall writing, the oversized Flipstart was launched with great fanfare, a humble Pentium M 1.1 GHz ticking away as its heart, and Vulcan confident that this ageing but venerable CPU would be sufficient for the Flipstart to beat all (except the Sony UX, but we all knew that from the start).
It should have been obvious at that point that they knew something we did not. If the Transmeta Crusoe 1.0 GHz was going to be enough, the VIA C7M 1.5 GHz was going to be more than adequate, and the Intel Pentium M 1.1 GHz was going to be in the stratosphere, what were we looking at for the rest?
The answer to that has not been long coming. The Intel IDF in China has hammered the nails into the coffin of performance aspirations for Handtop and UMPC devices, at least for another year.
The great hope of the UMPC/Handtop community over the last little while has been the tantalising rumours of a new Intel CPU range, that we now know is going to be called Menlow, including a built to purpose UMPC CPU called Silverthorne. This 45 nm part, which could eventually be released with integrated GPU and/or FSB has all the makings of an Intel magic part, similar to the ground breaking Pentium M when it was first released. Low power consumption, small size, low heat output, high performance, integrated components, huge connectivity potential and a projected low price, here is a CPU part that could help to popularise the whole UMPC/Handtop concept.
It is not to be, at least for now. For the next year or so, we are going to have to live with McCaslin.
Make no mistake, McCaslin is a smart move on Intel's part. They already have the infrastructure and designs for the chip, and the 90 nm Pentium M that is the basis for the McCaslin CPU is being phased out in favour of the Core CPU line-up, so why not use existing resources in a “new” CPU line to test the waters? Intel can't lose on this one. Clocked at 600 and 800 MHz, the McCaslin CPU's are not going to take business away from other Intel lines, and they can be sold cheap enough to put the squeeze on any competitors.
So what do we now have as a potential line-up for UMPC and Handtop devices for the next 12 months or so?
Starting at the top, we have the Sony UX. Its position as performance champion looks unassailable at present, it is in a class all of its own. Pricey and unique looking, but that is Sony.
Then we have a slew of older UMPC designs, and the Flipstart, all using Pentium M or Celeron M CPU's, pricey and reasonably good performers, although generally a bit large.
Then we have the small but acceptably performing OQO Model 02 with its VIA C7M CPU, also pricey, and the Samsung SPH P-9000, unusual, interesting features, mediocre performance and pricey.
That leaves us with the rest of the market, dominated to an extent it would seem by the smaller UMPC devices that are going to pop up over the next twelve months or so.
There are some compelling designs in the bunch. The HTC Shift looks to be a winner, and there are a number of others that have potential, including a whole bunch of interesting Intel designs. But for the most part, it would seem that these units will all have VIA CPU's at 1.2 GHz or less, or the Intel McCaslin CPU's at 600 or 800 MHz. We can also expect a handful of Celeron M CPU based devices, and maybe even a device or two using the AMD Geode CPU found in the Raon Vega.
A trend is emerging, and it is not what was expected and anticipated six to eight months ago. Where are the Core 2 Duo CPU's, where are the Handtops and UMPCs with laptop level performance? It is possible they are not going to arrive, at least not soon anyway. The trend seems to be to limit the performance of the CPU, extend the battery life of the unit, and bring the units to market at a reduced price.
The Transmeta Crusoe, the VIA C7M and the Intel McCaslin lines of CPU's all have similar performance figures. It would seem that the market has spoken (or so the CPU manufactures and device manufactures believe), and it wants battery life and good prices over performance in hand held units.
Perhaps this was to be expected. We have seen a similar trend over the last few years for the smaller laptops to be fitted with lower performance CPU's to extend battery life. With the even more limited batteries in Handtop and UMPC devices, this was probably the trend to expect.
It leads one to wonder how well Transmeta would have done in the CPU market if they had been able to hang in there for a year or so longer. Even AMD has a crack at this market with the Geode the way things are going.
For the next year or so, it looks like performance is not going to be the issue in the Handtop and UMPC market. It is possible that Handtop and UMPC manufacturers are feeling the heat from the top of the cell phone market, and need to change the rules. No doubt Sony, bucking the rules and trends as always, will continue with its ever innovative use of laptop components in the UX as the performance champion. For the rest, look to battery life and innovative features as the selling points of the units, because none of them are going to be burning rubber.
| |
Comments
04/19/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
GadgetFreak
Right on GD, handtops are all going to be cell phones.
04/19/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
GreatDane
Hi GadgetFreak,
Thank you for the comment, and I truly hope you are wrong, if you are alluding to Handtops dying of and being replaced by multi-purpose cell phone devices.
The convergence device that has been discussed elsewhere on this forum is not an endearing prospect if it is going to be cell phone based. I am hoping that McCaslin and Menlow will change this movement, permitting cell phone features in Handtops, but based on the x86 architecture that permits so much more flexibility. Perhaps HTC, now that they have produced the Shift, will be a leader in this area, as well as Samsung building on the SPH P-9000 concept.
The future with regard to this one aspect at least seems murky, and my crystal ball is not working at all 
04/19/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
GadgetFreak
GD, the man in the street wants cheap not good. They will buy anything if the price is low enough and the advertising is good. Cell phones will win because UMPCs are crap and cost a ton.
04/19/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
GreatDane
Hi GadgetFreak,
Lets hope the new and upcoming Intel chips can do something to change that!
04/19/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
GadgetFreak
Don't hold your breath.
edited: Apr 19 2007
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
GreatDane
Hi GadgetFreak,
I think you may be right as far as the cell phone (dumb phone) toting masses are concerned, they need to get used to the idea of a hand held device offering more than just connectivity and phone calls. And as market research suggests, there will be a percentage of that group who will never require or want anything more than a phone. But I am fairly convinced that the smart phone users and laptop computer users are a different kettle of fish in this regard. Although there is no doubt that cost of ownership will play a much bigger part in selecting the devices they are looking for than it does with the enthusiast Handtop market users at present, I believe there is a large gap in the market for configurable "smart" devices, if they are priced right.
Not wanting to get too far of the subject, there would seem to be a trend to limit the performance in a lot of the current and proposed Handtop and UMPC devices, for what would seem to be a number of good reasons. Firstly, the demand for really high powered Handtops does not seem to be large enough to warrant, at this point at least, the very expensive R & D required to make these devices happen. It would seem that we are in for a wait before we see a proliferation of devices that are a lot more powerful than the Sony UX. Secondly, heat dissipation and power consumption are obviously related and problematical issues. The easiest way to deal with them, while keeping the device small and inexpensive is to limit the CPU. Lower performance = lower power drain and lower heat generation. The third issue, and this one may well be the key issue, is battery life. Cell phones have created an expectation of battery life in excess of three hours on hand held devices. Keeping the cost and size of the unit down and still reaching three hours plus battery time by its very nature forces compromises, the most obvious candidate being CPU performance.
If one assumes that Intel in particular does not want to lose the UMPC and Handtop market to smart cell phones, one must also assume that they have come to similar conclusions. That being the case, the most obvious move on their part is to produce a low power consumption CPU that can be sold at a low cost, enabling small, inexpensive, low power drain units to be produced.
This is where the McCaslin and later the Menlow CPU's come in. As I see it, Intel is not just protecting market share against VIA (and AMD and Transmeta), but they are also actively trying to make the UMPC/Handtop concept more attractive to ward of the cell phone challenge. This is important for them, they are by far the biggest stakeholder in the PC CPU market, and not a big player at all in the cell phone market.
The devices showcased at the IDF, and being announced every day it seems, are testament to the need for CPU's like McCaslin and Menlow. VIA, Transmeta and Intel with their low power drain CPU's are the short term future of Handtops to a degree, and certainly UMPC's. If they are priced right, and are attractive enough, cell phone manufacturers like HTC might start producing Handtops in place of smart phones for the top end of the cell phone market. This can only be a good thing.
On the performance side, only time will tell. Performance Handtops will in my opinion stay a relativity small niche market for some time to come. Lets just hope that this is not always the case, and that we have some higher priced offerings that address the needs of those of us looking for a high performance unit.
04/19/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
whydidnt
One thing that's missing in the CPU equation is how poorly XP and to a larger extent Vista operate as mobile OS's. They are not optimized in any way to work as lightweight portable system managers. Intel at least is trying to take a different approach with Linux. However, we will probably need someone to develop a true UMPC OS before this segment takes off to the masses, much like happened with PALM developed the Palm OS.
MS needs to develop a hybrid OS that enables the device to maintain many of the Windows Mobile characteristics, such as instant on, smart-caching and use of memory, and apps designed for quick and easy utilization. A version of Office that doesn't load every feature by default for example. At the same time it has to maintain compatibility with all of todays x86 applications, so those that have to run a Windows application can. Take a look at how poorly Windows Media player performs on our 1 GHZ low power CPU's - compare that to how the Mobile version of the player works just fine on 300 Mhz pocket PC's. We don't need crippled applications, we just need smarter ones that use less resources, load faster, and work easier. So far XP, Vista and most related applications installed on our handtops are simply not designed for fast, easy, effecient, on-the-go use and that my friends is holding back this market much more than the hardware provided. I had high hopes for UMPC when MS announced it, but the reality is it's simply the same old OS with a couple of new skins and an on-screen keyboard.
04/19/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
ronaldheld
I believe that the average person wants good battery life, small size, Internet access, and maybe performance.
I need the performance. I also agree that the applications need to be recoded(or extra code added) to run fast a UMPC, but still have full compatiblity with the desktop/laptop versions.
04/19/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
kyone
Maybe Google with its online word processors etc will take a lead in this. That concept is still in its infancy stage but it might have a bigger part to play in the future.
I would like to see a lite version of Vista though. When people say VIA can't run Aero I say Aero can't run on VIA... I blame MS, surely its not that hard to make a translucent window spin around !!!
04/20/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
alcuin
Haier is coming out with a Core 2 Duo UMPC.
link
04/20/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
ronaldheld
That looks promising. More information would be welcome.
04/20/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
GreatDane
alcuin said: "Haier is coming out with a Core 2 Duo UMPC.
link"
Hi alcuin,
Thanks for the link. You just got to love it when someone bucks a trend. That looks like an interesting machine to watch out for, and the price does not seem to bad either.
Register / login
|
^
Handtops is Copyright 2003-2008 Handtops.com
All rights reserved. | Contact | RSS
|