Tiqit cPC FlipStart Sony VGN/U OQO
Handtops - The Meaning of Pocketable and Portability
Author: fil on June 28 2006
Viewed 6927 times. 9 people liked this blog. You can rate it below if you haven't already.
People who enjoyed reading this: kyone, Alt, MeanSquare, tnkgrl, GenM, Flenser, Chrizkatore, whydidnt, w0rn
I carry my OQO handtop/uPC/UMPC/microPC/tweener/palmtop in my pocket in the slim, form-fitting neoprene case that came with it. Whenever I need the OQO, it's with me and it is not sitting on my desk, in my car, at home, in my brief case, or in my bag. It goes right into my front pant pocket (jeans, khakis, cargo pants, and even in dress slacks). I can sit down just fine with it, although I will usually pull it out when I sit down and place it on a table where I'm at.

Unlike my other subnotebooks and uPCs before the OQO--Toshiba Libretto, Sony Picturebooks, Fujitsu Lifebook P-series and B-series, and my beloved Sony U50--it is everywhere I go because it's in my pocket with my keys, wallet, and cellphone and the OQO provides me the full Windows XP computing experience that I enjoy and demand in any notebook that I use.

I have Palm PDAs, PocketPCs, a Treo smartphone, unsmartphones (mostly Nokias or Sony-Ericssons), convertible Tablets, desktop replacement notebooks, regular 10"-12" notebooks, subnotebooks (Picturebook and Libretto), Rex PIMs, iPods, and GameBoys, and the biggest issue I had was that I couldn't take them every where with me.

I tried carrying the Picturebook and Libretto with me in a fanny pack or in a Franklin Planner case, but I always left it behind.

I switched from a iPAQ 3955 to the iPAQ 2215 because of the pocketable size.

When I used my Nokia 6820i cellphone I wore it in my front pant pocket with my wallet and my keys sat in my other front pant pocket. Now I put my OQO (which is inside of it's slim neoprene OQO case) in the pocket with my keys and carry my wallet and Treo 650 in the other pocket. Yes, my pockets are heavy and sometimes I wear the Treo on my belt using a clip.

Bottom line here, is that I can discretely carry the OQO with me to the Mall shopping, waiting at the doctor's office or for my wife to be done running her errands and I can sit in the car and surf, read, edit a file, watch TV streams, etc., carry it to meetings and take notes inconspicuously, etc.

I cannot do this with any other Windows device.

I can do it with my smartphone, but I don't have Windows and have to deal with compromises on a hamstrung OS such as Linux, Windows Mobile, and PalmOS.


When it comes to instant on, I usually put it in Standby mode so that within 3 seconds after I push the power button, it snaps back to life and is ready for action.

Part of the luxury of pocketability and portability is the compromise of data input and screen manipulation. In the notebook world, many of us know this as a keyboard and either a mouse, a trackstick, or a touchpad. On a Tablet, this is an on-screen keyboard or hand writing recognition (HWR).

Bottom line, most of the world is use to a keyboard, next they are use to dealing with a thumboard (e.g. the thumboard used on a BlackBerry, Treo, and SideKick), and very last is HWR. Technophobes such as Congressmen, lawyers, sales people, CEOs/executives, and government field workers have converged on the BlackBerry because it delivers email and they can type on it effectively using the built-in thumboard. The special needs community has embraced the SideKick. Corporate America has embraced the Treo for it's interoperability with Exchange through Goodlink, it's input ability, and overall platform versatility.

For a Handtop to be pocketable and portable, you need a self-contained device that you can bring by itself in a very slim scratch-resistant (not drop resistant) case that has a universally accepted input device like a thumboard or a keyboard.

In the past and present, many subnotebooks have failed because their full-sized keyboard are too small and too cramped to type on. This has been the biggest complaint to all of the subnotebooks in the past starting with the Toshiba Libretto, to the Sony Picturebook, to the Fujitsu P-series and B-series, to the Sony U1/3/101/TR, to the current Toshiba Libretto, etc. Conversely, slate Tablets and the first generation UMPCs have been slammed because there is no integrated keyboard available and no one knows how to use HWR. One must learn to cope with HWR, while a thumboard automatically allows us to mash away at the keys.

The compromise is the thumboard. People understand it, they are used to it, and their expectation is different than a normal keyboard when it comes to typing, but it's there and mentally they will get over the fact that they can type fairly quickly using the thumboard while on the go. If they need a full-sized keyboard, they are prepared mentally that they need to bring one with them (a folding USB or Bluetooth keyboard preferably).

My final thought on this entry is screen manipulation. Devices that are pocketable such as cell phones, BlackBerries, Treos, and some of the Handtop vendors use passive touchscreens that are easy to manipulate one-handed, with a finger and fingernail, and without requiring a special pen.

I believe that having an active digitizer, aka you need to use a special pen, on a screen that is 5" or less is insanity. I have yet to hear a valid need for an active digitizer on a Handtop. Jaggies? Erroneous screen touches? Come on, it's a 5" screen. The Sony U and UX prove that a passive touchscreen that can be manipulated by a fingernail works at 800x600 and 1024x600 resolutions and does not affect either issue that passive screen detractors have claimed. Bottom line, every portable device uses passive touchscreens.

Anyways, this is just my [not so] humble opinion.
I've wanted this portability and everywhere I go Internet access since the mid-90's and it's almost here.

Read this article, it sums up all of the negative press around the UMPC and sums up the same issues identified with subnotebooks and Handtops such as the Sony U and OQO: link
Read fil's other blogs.fil's Recent Blogs
Comments

That's what owning a handtop is all about. Can Sony compete at this level ?
 

I think that it's all a matter of time, consumer acceptance, and mass production of miniaturized components that will lower the overall cost to produce a Handtop.

Right now from various sites that I've read where people have dissected the Sony UX, Tablet Kiosk, and Samsung Eo, none of them have innovated the the hardware that they used. All of them used reference parts and standard board designs that already exist.

Only OQO has taken the time to miniaturize what has not been available and use software and a subprocessor to close the feature gap that they need on their motherboard designs that they could not build in the hardware.

Microsoft and Intel's UMPC design standards will hopefully make the Handtop genre a reality and help lower the costs by forcing newer and smaller board designs that will run XP Tablet OS and Vista with a current CPU and a current video processor (major flaws in the OQO 01 and 01+). Innovations like the OQO "subprocessor" also need to occur in order to continue to reduce costs and to move hardware into software to reduce overall device size.

Sony is huge. They like this field and they continue to show that they like to play in the Handtop market. The U1, U3, U101, U50, U70P, U8C, U8G, U750P, U71P, UX50, UX180P, and UX90 all came out of nowhere. They are all stunning in their uniqueness when they came out. Not everyone understood/understands them.

Sony also has been coming out with subnotebooks like the TR-series and Picturebooks with built-in Dual Layer DVD+RWs, WWAN, cameras, and Bluetooth in a small form factor, so they see the other niche need of a very small notebook with the embedded features that some reviewers and users demand--another niche.

This is the same issue with the UMPC, microPC, uPC, and Handtop. The platform is not for everyone, it's another niche hardware/software like the smartphone, BlackBerry, SideKick, slate Tablet, convertible Tablet, notebook, subnotebook, rugged notebook, ultra-thin notebook, iPod, PSP, GBA, Nokia 770, PPC, PDA, PMP, PocketPC, and PDA device that have to meet a specific purpose or will die like the standalone PocketPCs and PDAs that we are seeing today.

Cost also is a big concern in this platform. The vendors and the industry need to get together and figure out how to reduce Handtop components to lower the overall price.

There needs to be a purpose or it's a niche product vying for the same dollars as the other products listed above. Keep reading all of the reviews about UMPCs, old review about subnotebooks, the U, and the OQO, and it's all the same--mixed bag reactions on the platform with comparisons to the other gadgets above, price complaints, cramped keyboard/no keyboard/unusable thumboards, low battery life, slow performance, etc.

I'm a fan of this platform. It's what I've wanted since 1993, when the Internet opened up for commerce. Since 1996 when the first PDA came out, quickly followed by the first microPC, the Toshiba Libretto 50CT, and dialup services were getting cheaper and cheaper. Then Wifi struck and soon after cellular data services and now high-speed cellular broadband service. Now huge hard drives exist. The only pieces left are better batteries and use of batteries and cheaper prices for cellular data services and Handtops.

We're very close to inexpensive, very portable, and always connected computing devices that last all day.
Recent Blog: Apple iPhone Switch  

Well put, especially the rationalle behind needing a thumb-board.
I agree that cost and understanding are what keep handtops a niche market at present.
As far as cost, in some ways I do expect manufacturing to catch up with the needs, bringing prices of handtops down. Miniturizing will always have an associated cost, but the laptop market has shown that it goes down over time.
Understanding is a bigger issue. If you read an industry magazine or on-line review, you deal with the reviewer's preconceptions and even misconceptions. The same is true when you visit a brick-and-mortar and deal with even that most rare actually knowledgable salesperson. In both cases, they have access to the best and brightest desktop and laptop hardware and that's what they use as a basis of comparison. With desktops reaching toward 5GHz, a 1GH+ handtop will surely seem slow, but "too slow" or "fast enough" is a very subjective assessment. To make matters worse, most of the reviews and salesfolk don't use handtops on a regular basis. They don't understand the near-absolute need for a thumb-board. They don't understand the productivity boost from pulling it out of your pocket (or hip case even). They pass on their lack of understanding to those less knowledgable.

The other piece of the puzzle is that all of us reading this are at the leading edge of the curve. We're using (or at least reading about) technology that is still emerging. The battery life issue will be solved. The trends already show a steady increase in mAh (When are we going to switch to just Ah?) and decrease in size. The display size issue will be solved, either with eyepieces that display an equivalent of a 20 inch screen (or greater) and/or with flexible, pull-out screens. Eventually wireless access of some sort (some generation of cellular, WiFi, or whatever) will blanket at least the developed world. It's all coming... and probably sooner than any of us expect (but longer than any of us really wanted to wait )

i think there is an important argument beside discussions, if more tools in a little pc or cheaper offers brings handtops success or more acceptance.
until now most people (at least in germany) are half a time located fix at job and nearly the rest of their daytime at home (ok, they have a little bit time on the way to the job and a when returning to home:-). and for them work is work and they need no information from work at home. and their bosses aren`t amuse, when their employee take privat things (emails, videos,...) to job. and partners are not amuse, when you bring your work to your home.
need the big majority realy a handtop pc? or is the money better fund into new and bigger barbecues? i think this is a question of time, cause in the nearest future there are more and more jobs with no fix located office. more jobs with flexible workingtime. more necessity to change electronic informations by the fly. i have this situation since nearly 15 years and for me a good notebook is a must, a good handtop is better (cause i put my oqo easy with me like my mobilephone).
but it needs a little bit more time, until for the big majority handtops are not only expensive gadgets.
 

Good point jobjob.

I have two points. 1) convergence does not work for me and 2) everyone is different.

1) I like devices that have targeted uses and do not want an all in one solution. I don't want the handtop to replace a desktop or my phone to be a computer. For work, what made me relatively happy was a NEC Mobile Pro 780 and a high powered desktop. Yes the Mobile Pro was Windows CE and couldn't display a GIS based map or do a decent powerpoint, but I prefered to bring that with me on work trips because of its form factor, battery life, instant on, keyboard (i loved that keyboard), and basic communication and office productivity functions. If it had had decent powerpoint making and external display capacity and the ability to connect to a WiFi for internet and email, I would have been that much happier. The keyboard use is important for me. When the NEC was stolen I looked at the OQO and decided it was too expensive for what I got relative to my needs.

2) Computers are becoming part of every moment of life and they are not. It depends on what you want to do with your life. I want to use computers for communication through the written word and images for both work and home life. I don't want that communicaiton to be accessible 24/7 or in every situation I want it. If I did, then the perfect computer is one hardwired in my body, fully connected to my brain for control, direct visualization and input (bionic solution). The OQO and others like it are just primitive toys compared to that vision, and yet what I read in some of these blogs and see in computer company design attempts is the yearning for capability only attained in the bionic solution.
______
Bert
 

lcstruik: Good points.

Like you, convergence (as it is usually meant) doesn't work for me. I want a separate cell phone and handtop because I want to upgrade the cell phone in a different cycle than the handtop. What I do want is the two to work together fairly seemlessly. On the other hand, one reason that I'm using a handtop is that I want the convergence of PDA and laptop (which isn't quite here yet).

I believe one of the things that continues to sell desktop systems is that they aren't a one-size-fits-all product. If you want better performance in a particular area, you can find a system with that emphasis or upgrade components to make one. This kind of semi-modular thinking needs to work its way into more portable solutions.

Computers are becoming ubiquitous, but mostly in ways that aren't recognized as being computers (by most people). Many VCRs and all DVRs have embedded processors. Cell phones, of course, use embedded processors, but many conventional phones do too. Programmable thermostats, most new microwave and conventional ovens, some refridgerators, many new TVs and all manner of other consumer electronics are internally computerized. What is lacking in most of these is an interface and connectivity options to allow some cooperative work. I expect to live long enough to see at least part of that happen, not just for the "Look, I can turn on the microwave with my phone!" kind of toy aspect, but for something(s) actually useful. I envision downloading a recipe, connecting to the fridge and pantry to see if I've got what I need and creating a shopping list for what I don't have, then connecting to the stove and food processor to set the appropriate times, temperatures and so forth. I also envision having my schedule program note the fact that we'll be on vacation for the next week and adjust the HVAC system appropriately and auto-forward calls from people in my address book. And so on.

Great comments folks.

I agree.

Notebooks, Handtops, whatever are like cars--there are a lot of different makes, models, brands, and configurations. Every one of them appeals to different types of people.

I'm pitching for what I want. ;)

Ferrari, Porsche...good
OQO, Sony, (the concept of the) FlipStart...good

lcstruik,
I see the Handtop as a platform for your bionic computer.

Another poster here, GenM, talks about a Handtop "brick" with no screen that a Head Mount Display (HMD) can directly connect to. I see wearable computing being another possibile path for the Handtop, a small carry-everywhere device that can run the full version of Windows/Linux.

After that, your bionic computer, but that is still a future technology.
Recent Blog: Apple iPhone Switch  

I love the size of the OQO, and the battery life. What I can't stand is the wait. Turn it on, and go to the bathroom. By the time I get back, it's ready for my password. Start IE7. Go make a sandwich. By the time I am done, my home page has loaded in. Hit "Reply" in Outlook. Make a phone call. By the time I am done, I can type ten words. I should be getting my UX next week. I may keep the OQO just to have something that small when I absolutely need it. Otherwise, if I can live with the size, look for my 01+ on eBay.
 

I can't wait to get my OQO 01+ after the holidays are up. I work as a computer repair technician at Circuit City, and I just look forward to being always connected to our in-house wireless so that I will have access to our intranet for customer info and work orders all the time. Just the convenience of being able to whip out my OQO and look up a work order on the fly when a customer calls for a status check, instead of having to walk around the store and find an open terminal, is going to be SOOO nice. Not to mention the obvious show-off factor. The OQO is truly a piece of bling. No matter how much some of you may dislike its subpar specifications, you do have to admit that the OQO has got it going on when it comes to size and chicness. If only windows 2000 would run on it, that would make life so nice. 2000 pro could make such good use of OQOs hardware. Oh well.

Not to get off topic or anything, but has anyone run Counter Strike 1.6 or the original Half Life on the OQO? With 8 megs of video, direct X 8 compatible, it should theoretically run...
 


Register / login
You must be a member to reply or post. signup or login
FourOneOne NET: CloserCircle | Gamer411 | Profil3