Tiqit cPC FlipStart Sony VGN/U OQO
FlipStart E-1001S Benchmarks
StoreTags: FlipStart, benchmark
Author: captain on March 20 2007
Viewed 6151 times. 5 people liked this blog. You can rate it below if you haven't already.
People who enjoyed reading this: captain, alcuin, ArchiMark, elsewhere, 2disbetter
Numerical benchmarking is really only useful when you can compare against other devices that are in the same class. With handtops being as new as they are, there's really only the OQO to compare to. However, comparing numbers with the OQO wouldn't be fair since the two are a few years apart, and we don't have a OQO model 02 to benchmark. Add to this the fact that the focus of handtops isn't about performance so much as form factor and the purpose of benchmarking the FlipStart becomes somewhat more diminished. Regardless, it may be somewhat beneficial to have a point of comparison for those who are familiar with the benchmark numbers of laptops and computers they've worked with, if only to get a sense of how powerful (or not) you might find the FlipStart for whatever task you need.

I did the traditional benchmarks such as HD Tune, PCMark, 3DMark, Super Pi, Everest and HDTach. As I don't have an OQO I can't list comparison numbers, but I have made notes of my subjective impressions of various areas.

Pi test

This popular yet simple utility benchmarks the amount of time it takes to calculate Pi to 2 million decimal places. My run resulted in a time of 2m 42s.

HD Tune and HD Tach

HD Tune
The Hard Drive used in the FlipStart is the MK3008GAL 30GB drive from Toshiba which uses UDMA Mode 5 (Ultra ATA/100). Here's a screenshot of the supported features.

Toshiba MK3008GAL Supported Features


Here's a graph of the benchmark according to HD Tune.

Toshiba MK3008GAL Supported Benchmarks


HD Tach
Benchmarking in HD Tach was done using the Long bench (32mb zones) method. Results are below.

Toshiba MK3008GAL Supported Benchmarks


Many were hoping that with such a small capacity, and with Sony's move to include a flash disk, the FlipStart might feature the same. But for now we have to deal with a regular Hard Drive.

PC Mark 2005

The final PC Mark score is 1286. Individual results are given below.

• HDD - XP Startup 4.32 MB/s
• Physics and 3D 45.23 FPS
• Transparent Windows 132.11 Windows/s
• 3D - Pixel Shader 4.07 FPS
• Web Page Rendering 1.67 Pages/s
• File Decryption 26.85 MB/s
• Graphics Memory - 64 Lines 235.4 FPS
• HDD - General Usage 2.55 MB/s
• Multithreaded Test 1 / Audio Compression 564.82 KB/s
• Multithreaded Test 1 / Video Encoding 78.18 KB/s
• Multithreaded Test 2 / Text Edit 29.23 Pages/s
• Multithreaded Test 2 / Image Decompression 6.42 MPixels/s
• Multithreaded Test 3 / File Compression 1.24 MB/s
• Multithreaded Test 3 / File Encryption 6.68 MB/s
• Multithreaded Test 3 / HDD - Virus Scan 4.45 MB/s
• Multithreaded Test 3 / Memory Latency - Random 16 MB 6.01 MAccesses/s

3D Mark

3D Mark crashed after the first test. I read that there might be an issue with 3D Mark and Windows Media Player 10+, so I downgraded to 9.0 but it still crashed. Read the next FlipStart segment for my detailed look at gaming. In short, you'll be surprised and impressed.

Battery Eater

Battery Eater's intensive tests were run with all the power-saving functions set to off. This means that the hard drive and screen were set to not turn off like they normally would after a bit of inactivity. Furthermore, the graphics were taxed heavily, so this is probably akin to watching a movie. The total time to deplete the battery from 99.9% was around 2 and 1/4 hours. Under more 'normal' conditions that one would expect to use this machine in, such as a bit of word processing, browsing, file management, etc, you could easily expect up to 3 hours or maybe more.

Everest Hardware Report

If you want to know the names of all the ports, settings, versions and capabilities of components used in the FlipStart, the Everest hardware report is for you. You can view it here.

Overall

In the end, the above numbers and graphs only tell part of the story. I found the FlipStart to be plenty adequate for the tasks I was doing. It's hard to expect such a small device to be a powerhouse, but even going in with that presumption I was impressed. File manager tasks work fine, the USB 2.0 port was more than capable of copying files around and general system performance was great. No complaints whatsoever.

Other parts of my detailed look at the FlipStart

FlipStart E-1001S first impressions
FlipStart E-1001S Pics and details
FlipStart E-1001S Benchmarks
Gaming on the FlipStart E-1001S
Interview with FlipStarts Keith Amodt
Read captain's other blogs.captain's Recent Blogs
Comments

captain, thanks for all of the benchmark data. What I need to see from someone else with a unit is a WWAN rerport and whether it is EV-DO Rev 0 or Rev A. Do you think the USB port can power a modem on batteries?
Recent Blog: FS fan question  

Awesome review, great details on the benchmarks.

ronald: do you know of any apps that test wwan? Don't quote me on this but I recall hearing that the shipping devices will be Rev A.
Recent Blog: Samsung Q1 Ultra released  

captain, there are links where the upload and download speeds are tested. I have one bookmarked at home and will post it here later today. Can you say whether the WWAN service is from Sprint or Verizon?
Recent Blog: FS fan question  

captain
Was that 2.25hrs you got with the standard battery or the thin battery?
diJenerate

captain, i used this site for my EV-Do test: link
Recent Blog: FS fan question  

Unfortunately I won't be able to do any cell tests as my test FS didn't come with EVDO.
Recent Blog: Samsung Q1 Ultra released  

Thanks anyway, captain . Maybe someone else will be able to run the test soon?
Recent Blog: FS fan question  


Register / login
You must be a member to reply or post. signup or login
FourOneOne NET: CloserCircle | Gamer411 | Profil3