| StoreTags: Handtops, performance
Viewed 1469 times. 0 people liked this blog. You can rate it below if you haven't already.
I am happy with my OQO Model 01+. I had to live without it for a while just recently, and it brought home to me how good the unit really is.
Make no mistake, I would be saying the same thing if I were the proud owner of an OQO Model 02, or a Sony UX, or a Sony U, or a Flipstart...
While I may shell out for a new Handtop some time in the not to distant future, I also may not. If I do, it is because the illogical lust for the shiny new unit has overpowered the logic that says I don't need it.
I bought the OQO Model 01+ as an always carry backup unit. In that context, it performs brilliantly. It is never going to be powerful enough to be my primary machine. But if I apply the same criterion to the other Handtops currently available, or soon to be released, or even still in the concept stage, I come to the same conclusion I came to before buying the Model 01+: They are still not powerful enough to perform as my primary machine, even in a dock attached to an external monitor etc.
This being the case, the logical question that begs an answer is: Why spend money on replacing a perfectly good machine that does the job I require of it with another machine that will still only do the same job?
(I am sure there must be a number of good answers to that question! )
If one has a working Handtop that is not ones primary machine, but that does the job, then maybe the way to decide, aside from lust, when it is the right time to upgrade the unit is to look at it from the other side of the equation: What is my minimum requirement for my primary machine?
One can leave keyboard, screen and mouse out of the equation, external units can be attached to just about any Handtop. What one needs to look at are the other factors to do with technical capability and performance.
The first question to answer is: What does one have to, or want to, be able to do on the machine?
In my case, I don't play games, I spend too much time in front of a computer already to want to do that, so a gaming machine is not required. Nor do I edit video, or do much photo editing, or work more than once in a blue moon on a CAD package, so a machine with a discrete graphics card is not a requirement. What I do require is a machine that I can design, develop, compile and test large software packages with large databases on. This requires a reasonably powerful CPU, preferably a dual core, a reasonably large amount of RAM, a high resolution VGA output for an external monitor of at least 1600 x 1200, and a large, reasonably high speed HDD. WiFi 802.11 g is a must, and Bluetooth a preference. Internal HSDPA would be a nice to have.
From a CPU point of view, a single core 2.0 GHz Pentium M or a Core Duo 1.6 GHz CPU are about the lowest performance items that will get the job done.
2 GB RAM would be nice, but 1 GB is about the minimum that I can use without performance being impacted.
A 60 GB 7200 RPM HDD is about the smallest, slowest drive I could use, a 64 GB SSD would be better.
A two hour minimum battery life is a requirement, three hours would be better.
The rest is pretty immaterial.
On the Handtop side, as a primary unit, I have certain requirements as well. The unit must be pocket sized, 150 mm x 100 mm x 34 mm or there about. It must have a built in keyboard. I don't care if it is a slider, convertible tablet, clamshell etc. It must be able to connect to a VGA screen without a docking station. A few USB ports would be nice. I would prefer the screen to be as big as possible, covering the entire face of the unit would be good. A minimum screen resolution of 1024 x 600 would be preferable.
My hardware specification requirements have not changed in a number of years. I have been working on laptops that meet these minimum requirements for years now, ever since my first 3.2 GHz Pentium 4 Laptop. Aside from games, and video related matters (where the requirements are ever growing and never met), a top of the line laptop from 5 to 6 years ago is fast enough to perform all the basic tasks.
So what I would need in order for my Handtop to also be my primary machine would be a 2 GHz Core Solo (or like performing) or 1.6 GHz Core Duo (or like performing) CPU, 1 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD machine with integrated graphics and a built in keyboard with a two hour battery life that would fit in a pocket.
The day when such a machine becomes available seems a while off yet. Until a unit like that arrives on the scene, the only reason to upgrade from the OQO Model 01+ is that I WANT the new machine. Now that is not beyond the realms of possibility!
| |
Comments
03/29/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
GenM
Sounds like you are trying to convince yourself ;)
03/29/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
GreatDane
More a question of sanity versus saliva!
03/29/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
tchernev
Hi GreatDane,
I find that over the past couple of weeks every time I have thought about an issue related to handtops, in the next day or so you have a blog about that very same issue! While these days I have been way too busy to participate in the discussion, the baby is asleep now, so let me indulge myself 
Let me first say that my current laptop, a Transmeta equipped Fujitsu Lifebook P2110, has been my primary machine for the past 4 years, and I know with certainty that I will not need a more powerful machine in the foreseeable future. I am a mathematician, and my primary applications are latex, emacs, maple, a computer algebra system called Macaulay2, web browsing and email. All of these were performed flawlessly even by my previous laptop, a 266 MHz Pentium I Toshiba. Recently, because of the baby, I've also had to do quite a bit of video capturing and processing, which the Transmeta does also flawlessly using VirtualDub (I have Win2000, so no MovieMaker, and probably better for that). The only complaint I have of my current laptop, even though it is as small and light as it gets (3.1lbs, and 10.6 inch screen), is that it is too big and heavy! And it makes me carry it in a bag with me everywhere I travel! (I am sure you have never before heard such complaints! )
So, you may ask, why haven't I already gotten the OQO 01+, as it clearly can become my primary machine? The main reason is because I cannot justify the expense while I still have a perfectly good working laptop in my posession (speaking of the lust, ah, that's another story ). However, there is another reason as well, and that goes into what I would like to be able to do with my new to... ahem, work machine. I am not the type of person that will need to whip out the handtop in a hurry and in lightning speed enter the few words of data needed at that very moment. On the opposite, I cannot really touch-type, in fact I like to take my time with my input, and mull over my sentences, equations and diagrams, as I am entering them in digital format that will preserve them for the eternity. And so I would really like to have a well designed tool for handwriting and graphics input - something that right now all the handtops either in development or in the market do not quite have (the OQO 02 I am not sure yet, and the UX has way too small screen for that kind of endeavor). Do not get me wrong, I still would like to have a good thumb keyboard for those occasions that it is not convenient to do handwriting - like in a crowded bus or when a flat surface is not handily around.
Back to the point, and the question in your blog title, YES, I think OQO 01+ is enough , (or, if I am not entitled to an opinion as I do not own it, then I shall say, OQO 02 is enough, as noone has it yet). In fact, now I begin to wonder, may be one can do video capture and processing on the 02 also using VirtualDub? I guess it will depend on how the graphics chip of the 02 compares to the fairly crappy ATI Rage Mobility card of the P2110... Oh, well, one more thing that I will not have time to check up on...
03/30/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
GreatDane
Hi tchernev,
Thank you for your comments, and your very interesting take on the matter.
If I may take the liberty of an assumption? It sounds like the OQO Model 02 could well be the Handtop that could function as your primary machine.
From what I can glean from various sites, it would seem that the integrated video card in the Model 02 might well be powerful enough to handle video capture and processing, but only time will tell on that one.
I am at present busy with a huge project, one that keeps me working long hours. I take a break every couple of hours or so, and having a look at what is going on on this site is a great way of clearing my mind. So you will forgive me if I am writing too much!
I am not, as you might have gathered, the worlds biggest fan of handwriting input, although I would be the first to admit it has its place. I do believe that a touch screen and a keyboard are both necessary on a unit the size of a Handtop.
May your lust come true!
Register / login
|
^
Handtops is Copyright 2003-2008 Handtops.com
All rights reserved. | Contact | RSS
|