| StoreTags: UMPC, Handtops
Viewed 4110 times. 3 people liked this blog. You can rate it below if you haven't already.
Every market needs a “Model T Ford” to impart momentum and propel it to critical mass. This is rarely the invention that started the whole thing of, but most usually the mass market unit that is affordable and catches the public's attention and imagination. It is not inconceivable that the HTC Shift is one such product.
Inventions tend to come in clumps. Circumstances often produce a number of different inventions addressing a similar problem all within a short time period. It is axiomatic that things are invented when they are because it is the right time for them to exist. Popularising the concept and changing the idea from an invention to a commodity takes something else entirely, marketing the right product at the right price at the right time, and capturing the public's imagination in the process.
The inventing has been done, Handtops are the result. But as is usually the case, they have yet to become a popular consumer item. For that we will need to look elsewhere.
While the quest for a small, portable computer that is powerful enough to do the same job as a desktop has been on the go since almost the beginning of the PC era, it is only in the last few years that the technology has existed to make this dream a reality. The time is right for creation/invention of hand top computers.
While the quest for a truly portable hand held computer continued, laptop computers and cell phones developed at an incredible pace, becoming commonly accepted and used devices. This has been both good and bad for the hand top computer cause. On the one hand, laptops have cemented the concept of portable computers, and have set the expectation as far as usability and performance are concerned, while cell phones have defined the form factor and to an extent the feature set. On the other hand, this has set the bar for hand top computers very high.
For a hand top computers to be successful, they should have the performance of a laptop, and a form factor not to dissimilar to that of a cell phone, and all this at a price that is affordable to the average consumer. We are still a way from achieving that, but in the last few years, great progress has been made.
I would suggest that the development of the UMPC is as a direct result of the comparative success of units like the OQO and the various Sony hand top computers (Handtops), as well as a few other units. In particular, the OQO and the Sony U and UX series have had an impact disproportionate to their success in the market place. They are devices that came along at the right time, and fired the imagination of people, including some very influential and powerful people who wanted to see the dream turned into a general reality.
The problem with the Sony UX and the OQO is that they are too expensive to push the concept into the main stream. Like the Rolls Royce's of the early days of motoring, they are financially out of reach for the vast majority of people. They exist as a testament to what can be achieved. For motoring to become a widespread utility, it needed a Model T Ford.
It is obvious that what hand top computers need is there own version of the Model T Ford. That was (presumably) the vision behind the UMPC.
The first UMPC's were a notable failure as mass market devices. The big manufacturers who had the means to popularise the form factor made a serious miscalculation regarding price. They also ignored the most obvious lesson of resent computer history, and adopted the tablet form factor, not taking into cognisance the relative failure of the tablet PC. Smaller, less expensive units like the Raon Vega were never widely advertised and marketed in the US and Europe. No Model T in that lot.
But things are changing. Samsung has added a keyboard of sorts to the Q1, and a whole lot of attractive designs are starting to appear. But it is the specialist phone maker HTC that seems to have come up with the UMPC equivalent of the Model T Ford.
The HTC Shift is not going to be the hand top computer for everybody, particularly not for the Handtop enthusiasts who expect better performance, smaller size etc. It is, however, likely to be the unit that appeals to a broad spectrum of people who would not spend the money on a Handtop or one of the existing UMPC's. It has the advantage of looking something like a small laptop. While this might not be the ideal form factor for a hand held computer, it is the form factor that people not familiar with Handtops associate with portable computers.
HTC also have the advantage of being first and foremost a cell phone manufacturer. They understood the importance of communications from the outset. For companies like OQO and Sony, this was a lesson they have had to learn, and are still learning.
HTC will hopefully also bring their expertise in producing sophisticated units at a price to the hand top computer arena. If the price is right, and it is well advertised and marketed, I would imagine that the HTC Shift is going to sell like hotcakes. For the moment, it is the right form factor, the right size, has the right mixture of features, and it has potentially the right price to make a big impact on the market. In short, the HTC Shift seems to have the potential to be the UMPC Model T Ford, the unit that really kick-starts the UMPC market, and helps to grow it to critical mass.
Companies like Intel, with their UMPC reference designs, will benefit from any real success that HTC has with the Shift. The Intel designs are arguably too sophisticated and outside the box to have the kind of impact that a unit like the Shift can have. They will come into their own as the market learns about the hand held computer concept. Once the market reaches a certain size, there will be a synergy between the various designs, and one success will lead to the success of others. Manufacturers are in turn likely to be encouraged by any real success, and this in turn is likely to lead to the production of more and better designs to sell in the expanding market.
Unlike at present, where new designs are fighting for a slice of a limited and slowly growing market, a market that has already seen the success of a “Model T” will grow with each new entry.
In a scenario as described above, Handtops will prosper at the top end of this market. They will probably remain niche market products for the foreseeable future, but the niche will expand as public awareness of the UMPC form factor grows. Eventually, we are likely to see today's Handtop type designs competing head to head with newer UMPC's, and even incorporated into the UMPC fold. Hopefully by that time Handtops will have moved on to better things.
All it takes for the market like the hand top computer market to blossom if for there to be one really successful design that is priced right and catches the public's imagination. Once any market reaches critical mass and has sufficient momentum, it will continue to expand and grow until it reaches maturity. After that point, it takes a revolutionary development to kill that market off (As for example motorcars killed the horse drawn buggy market). I believe that HTC is in the position to produce the product that leads to this flourishing.
For all the pioneering work of OQO and Sony, and all the others who have contributed to the concept, I believe that the HTC Shift may well go down in history as the device that made it all happen.
| |
Comments
04/02/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
jimscraft
I think that your point is well taken. I would only suggest that The HTC Shift could be more like the first Honda Civic- a well engineered (for the time) car that was both practical and fuel efficient, that took a niche market and destroyed what people thought of little cars (especially from Japan). Also, like the move from cell phones to handheld computers, Honda was attempting to branch out in to cars after success in the motorcycle arena. If the HTC Shift does have a quality build, is reasonably competent at the tasks given to it by the user, and comes in at a price point that is less than the OQO/Sony/Vulcan counterparts, it will sell well. For Honda in the late 70's, the Civic was a make or break deal- their automotive future literally hung in the balance- I just hope that this is not the case for HTC, and that consumers give them a chance.
04/02/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
ArchiMark
Good points, GreatDane & jimscraft....
AFAIK, we don't know pricing on Shift...as was mentioned I think this will be key point as to ultimate success or not of Shift and whether it does or doesn't sell like hotcakes....
The Shift needs to be priced low enough for average consumer, not just us gadgetgeeks to feel like it's 'reasonably priced' for what it offers...while we may question the buying decisions of the 'average consumer', whatever that is, I do think that they do have a good barometer intuitively usually of what feels right value-wise. If it does and of course offers something they want and is perceived to offer something of value then they'll buy...
Just my 2 cents.... ;-)
04/02/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
Kenrick
I think the real flourishing will happen in 2008 with the Steeley/McCaslin architecture. If they are as low cost as Intel has hinted, and low power without compromising too much on performance, then that combined with Intel's marketing push could bode well for the whole UMPC/handtop category.
04/02/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
primaz
Your fairly close to me. You are right about a more mainstream device that the mass market would adapt. The mass market prefers touch type keyboard as that is the same as desktop and laptops. What the mass population would adapt is a version small enough to be carried on a person without any type of computer bag, etc.; I believe the best size would be built around the form factor of a jacket pocket like devices like the old Psion. I disagree about the price and the reference to a model t. The reality is that if such a device were built the prices anywhere from $900 to the current prices of OQO, etc. are fine and would not prevent mass adoption. That infussion of mobile users would help handtop companies purchase parts, etc. cheaper and thus drive that form factor's prices down also.
The real reason why UMPC and devices like the OQO and others are not widely adopted is not fully the price at all but rather than form factor serves a niche segment at this point in time. All the people I know in the business world would have no issue spending $2000 for a mobile computer but only if it was small enough to stow in a jacket and only if it has the touch type input of a laptop.
Devices in the UMPC and OQO and others are great as they have used new technology to demonstrate that now computers can be that small. What is needed is for a company to take current technology and mold it into a more traditional form factor of a pocket laptop. People want technology to enhance their prefered methods of use and right now the mainstream users prefer touch type keyboards not pen or thumb; that is why this great new demonstrations of technology is not mainstream yet.
04/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
SomeName
This is a test message...haven't been able to post on this site on some time so am trying a new user name.
04/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
SomeName
This is not a test message...I can now apparently post in this name.
The HTC Shift is important because it addresses the primary problem that most other makers have missed: we don't have the smallest touchtype device that technology allows. OEMs should be continually chasing this goal, but lost sight of it for some time, with various keyboardless and non-touchtype-keyboard models that are interesting design exercises, useful to a limited extent at least for certain people, but critically limited.
The problems with the HTC Shift are a few. It's targeted at a lower-priced niche, which makes some of the tradeoffs understandable, but there's an unnatural gap in the market where there should be a premium model that's the best that can be done presently while keeping the keyboard big enough to type on. For a flagship device, the hard drive is small, and should be solid state, really (yes, I know static RAM is expensive currently, but flagships are expensive until the price comes down). The screen resolution is too low, and the device is too deep front-to-back...the additional depth beyond that necessitated by the keyboard makes such a device much less useful due to portability concerns. The HTC screen also wastes bezel space...the screen size should be maximized to the form factor...this also costs money if it requires departing from an off-the-shelf screen, but flagships in this market should be developing the perfect screen and computer internals to just cover the minimum useful keyboard, and then achieve volume with that screen. Their main subsequent task is to reduce device thickness for a few years. The HTC configuration has poor screen protection; something like a clamshell is better. Note that the minimum-sized keyboard will be different for different hands, and that a larger keyboard allows for a larger display, and that both of those are good but create a portiability tradeoff. An ideally-provided market would have devices shrunken around a range of keyboards available so we could choose the best one for our hands and to optimize utility vs. our personal portability needs.
The HTC should have additional competition by the time it actually hits the market, however. I'd expect some new product announcements in the small PC space related to Intel's Santa Rosa launch. If not, at the right price, HTC may have a big hit because the market is not serving the area of greatest need, and HTC has a better approximation than much of what's available. But I really think the market needs more aspirational devices. HTC is to some extent jumping the gun on the low-priced feature-stripped niche since the aspirational models are not there yet, but by preannouncing they may improve their defense of that low-cost niche.
04/05/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
jamesmobile
I think the HTC is moving in the right direction but not perfect yet due to the size being just a hair too large. If it were small enough to carry in a pocket which would just require it to be a little narrower then it would have less competition but it still is unique enough to probably have enough sales to do ok? I agree with the comments from others whom talk about the various form factors. I think a true model T device would need a touch type keyboard yet need to be small enough to fit in a large pocket to distinguish it from subnotebooks, UMPC's, etc. The form factor alone would probably make it a hit and if it were priced say 600-1000 it would be a model T as that price is cheap if it were a pocket size laptop. That does not mean there is not needs for small shirt pocket devices without true keyboards but that is what I think a computer model T would need to be to really make mobile computers that common.
Register / login
|
^
Handtops is Copyright 2003-2008 Handtops.com
All rights reserved. | Contact | RSS
|