09/08/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
diJenerate
GreatDane,
I second that thought (with the minor correction about keeping the motherboard - most of these upgrades and cooling improvements will require a new board design except for CM to nano, same socket there) and I believe that Intel is one big corporation that has shown a lack of corporate responsibility thereby letting this industry down - sadly for most it was unnoticed.
In this economic crisis, great UMPC innovators and design houses have shut down while Intel enjoyed increased profits - both events due to the Atom Processor. Intel has regurgitated instruction set designs and performance from 5 years ago at a smaller micron level, with a lower thermal envelope and smaller die along with massive marketing spins allowing the SOC concepts to live on and their profits to grow in a recession while destroying innovation and creativity in this sphere.Their sheer size and deep pockets have allowed them to influence global spending habits with regard to tech to the detriment of the engineering houses that actually made an effort (Raon Digtal, OQO, Flipstart et al) all for a short term profit and to what end...
We are buying PCs with 1.6GHz Processors, that are out-performed by the 900MHz Intel Celerons of 4 years ago, with the promise of longer battery life (that when seen, is only as a result of the use of other low power components in the design - RAM, display, backlight etc), are cheaper (but what 4 year old PC isn't if large quantities of it are sold) and are smaller (bring back the Pentium III or Pentium 4 on today's manufacturing processes and integrate the I/O and memory controller and it too will yield a smaller board), does this seem like progress or merely profit - The largest chip maker in the world just performed the largest con on that world!
Up next Intel will attempt to sell the world the same Core Solo processor that we saw at premium price in then 'fancy' units like the Q1U Premium from Samsung and the Vaio UX from Sony, only this time on a smaller micron process, at a lower cost and with a new name - Consumer Ultra Low Voltage processor (CULV)... did I say attempt, I meant succeed - as the mass market is clueless and Intel has perfected the art of exploiting the ignorance of these people!
As far as seeing the existing designs that work being upgraded by third parties, I would love to but it seems that in our capitalist society, creativity takes a back seat to profit... not enough of us seem to care about the future technological growth and progress over our own bank accounts today to do what it will take to make this happen (forget the challenge, it's all about profit)...The Flipstart would be great with a 128GB SSD, a C2D, 2GB RAM and Android on the LID but you'd have to get Vulcan to release specs and details on the hardware before anyone could make a move and let's face it, they won't; after all, where's the profit in it for them?
diJenerate
12/04/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
johnnyboy
I too own a flipstart and love it. The only complaint I have about it is the too short battery life. But that complaint goes unheard in these days of the idea that handtop users only use their handtops a couple hours a day and its not a problem to have it the rest of the 16 hour day. But anyway I'd like to mention a couple new handtops on the market. The first is the Sharp Netwalker. It is about the same size as my flipstart only much lighter and thinner. Much more pocketable. It has a 10 hour battery life which will still be a little short for my 16 days but much more useable. It runs a version of Ubuntu which is stock!! Its my prefered upgrade to my Flipstart.
UMID has come out with a Windows handtop. It is called the mbook M1. It has a 5 hour battery life and runs XP. It is a typical windows machine with all the typical defects including a too short battery life. Runs slow and hot. It too is about the same size as my old Flipstart but much thinner and lighter. Even needs a dongle to listen to mp3s. It doesn't make it for me but should be great for the typical windows user.
