Tiqit cPC FlipStart Sony VGN/U OQO
page 1 | 167 posts new topic new blog Store  
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
thread starter

Apple announces third-party software details for iPhone


link
 
Replies

Seems like Apples way of saying the phone isn't locked. But still web apps as opposed to machine apps. Big difference.

I like the iPhone, but I don't like Apples way of keeping it all to them.

2d
 

I will not be on the iPhone bandwagon. I don't own an iPod either (I have a Zune, which is great!). I'm sure I will be one of the few that don't get an iPhone, but that is OK by me. By the way, did Apple settle with the manufacturer that had been using the name iPhone for several years? I hadn't heard anything since the lawsuit was filed...
Recent Blog: FlipStart News Flash!!!  

Linksys / Cisco and Apple both use the iPhone name now as buddies, as for lawsuit let's see if this thing makes it without one (WM based)

link
 

You can see my comments here: link

tnkgrl: Pretty much what I was thinking. The other issue I have with this "solution" is that the apps not only run on the web (with all the requisite need for a good high-speed connection), but they also have to run off of "the developers own server." That means these iPhone apps that are written by folks with dedicated servers and, as such, mostly be "enterprise" applications, likely with their own subscription fees

The one major problem as I see it with the iPhone is: It is a phone that is primarily not a phone. Once you get through all the hype, it is a multi-media player etc, which also happens to be able to make phone calls. It might well be the super next generation iPod, but without keys, it use as a phone is limited.

For a phone to succeed, especially a phone in that price range, it needs above all other things to excel at being a phone. All the rest is nice, but if it is not a good phone, irrelevant.
Recent Blog: Performance Capped  

*GreatDane*, I think the iPhone will be a great phone and a great media player - my concerns are with the limited camera, the missing 3G and the fact that, without 3rd party apps (ie. with only web apps), it's no longer a smartphone.

Hi tnkgrl,

I agree it looks to be a great media player, but I am still not sold on a phone with only touch screen. I had one for a week (some flavor of iMate WM), and got rid of it after trying to make an emergency call from my car. Just no way of dialing without looking at the screen.

The poor camera , missing 3G and web only based apps limit it further. As a iPod that makes phone calls, it is great. As an upmarket phone that has multi media capabilities, it falls short of the mark.
Recent Blog: Performance Capped  
Having enjoyed my Neonode N1m for almost 3 months now, I think it's possible to have a touch-based phone that can be used with one hand without looking at the screen... The key of course (pardon the pun) is haptic feedback (which the N1m provides using vibration)!

iPhones starting to show up in public..

link
 

I saw a few iPhones being used by employees at Apple HQ a few weeks ago... Apparently they can use them in public but they can't demo them or let others touch them!

tnkgrl said: "I saw a few iPhones being used by employees at Apple HQ a few weeks ago... Apparently they can use them in public but they can't demo them or let others touch them!"


Not even touch them, is there a definition for this touching?
What if a person looks over the shoulder of a user in public transportation...

Either way a couple more weeks and we can all do the touching
 

*ecsk2*, touch, you know, as in physically touch

tnkgrl said: "*ecsk2*, touch, you know, as in physically touch "



So on public transportation I bump into someone with an iPhone (physically) does he/she get fired?

Yeah yeah I spliting hairs, you should know me by now...
 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

Register / login
You must be a member to reply or post. signup or login
FourOneOne NET: CloserCircle | Gamer411 | Profil3